Image Intensifier vs. Thermal Imager: A Detailed Comparison

image intensifier
thermal imager
night vision
infrared
low light

This article explores the differences between image intensifiers and thermal imagers, two key technologies used in night vision devices. Both enable vision in low-light conditions, overcoming the limitations of the human eye in environments with reduced spectral range and intensity. These technologies are crucial in applications like surveillance, security, navigation, hunting, and wildlife observation, and are incorporated into devices such as cameras, goggles, scopes, and binoculars.

Image Intensifier: Amplifying Low Light

How it Works

  • Image intensifiers utilize the principle of image intensification.
  • They gather small amounts of light, primarily from the visible and near-infrared bands of the electromagnetic spectrum, which are reflected off a target scene in low light.
  • The collected photons undergo a series of conversions within an image intensifier tube: photon-to-electron conversion, electron multiplication, and electron-to-photon conversion.
  • Beyond the tube, the device uses components like a lens to collect photons, an eyepiece to view the intensified image, and a power supply to generate the necessary DC voltages for electron acceleration.

The Intensification Process

  • Low-level light enters the device, striking a photocathode which releases photoelectrons.
  • These electrons are accelerated and focused by a high-magnitude electric field toward a Microchannel Plate (MCP).
  • The MCP contains millions of tiny channels; as electrons enter, they are accelerated further by another strong electric field and multiplied through secondary emission as they bounce off the channel walls.
  • For each electron entering the MCP, approximately 1,000 electrons are generated.
  • These multiplied electrons are accelerated toward a phosphor screen, which converts them back into photons.
  • For each photon entering the intensifier tube, tens of thousands of photons exit after emission from the phosphor screen. A CCD, EMCCD, or ICCD sensor is often used to further capture the output based on the specific requirements.

The Result

This multi-stage process results in an intensified image that is significantly brighter than the original, low-light image. Image intensifier technology has evolved through several generations (e.g., generation-0, generation-1, generation-2, generation-3, generation-3+, and generation-4), each offering improvements in performance and clarity.

Image Intensifier

Thermal Imager: Seeing Heat

How it Works

  • Thermal imagers operate on the principle of thermal imaging.
  • Unlike image intensifiers, they do not rely on visible light, allowing them to function in complete darkness.
  • They capture the infrared (IR) energy emitted by objects, which is then processed using sophisticated algorithms to construct a viewable image.
  • Thermal imaging sensors are typically more expensive than sensors sensitive to the visible spectrum like CCD/CMOS sensors.

The Thermal Imaging Process

  • The thermal imager includes a lens, a 2D array of photo sensors, signal conditioning, and signal processing modules.
  • The lens focuses the IR radiation onto the 2D array of IR detector elements, which creates a temperature pattern known as a thermogram.
  • Thermal imagers measure subtle temperature differences, converting these invisible heat patterns into clear, visible images.
  • Sensors scan at a rate of 30 times per second, detecting temperatures ranging from -20°C to +2000°C and can sense temperature variations as small as 0.1°C.
  • This temperature pattern is translated into electronic impulses, which are then processed into a displayable image.

Thermal Imager Principle

The Result

Thermal imagers allow users to “see” heat signatures, making them invaluable in situations where visible light is absent or obscured. They are used in a wide range of applications, including detecting heat leaks, identifying people in the dark, and monitoring equipment temperatures.

Key Differences Summarized

FeatureImage IntensifierThermal Imager
PrincipleImage intensificationThermal imaging
Light RequirementRequires some ambient lightOperates in complete darkness
Sensor TypePhoto-cathode and MCPIR detector array
Image BasisAmplified visible and near-IR lightHeat signatures/temperature differences
Typical CostGenerally less expensive than thermal imagersGenerally more expensive than image intensifiers
Output ImageEnhanced view of existing light sourcesFalse-color map based on thermal radiation
Ideal Use CaseLow-light observationComplete darkness, heat-signature detection

This comparison highlights the distinct advantages of each technology. Image intensifiers excel at amplifying existing light, while thermal imagers provide vision based on heat signatures, offering unique capabilities for various applications.

Related Posts

WLAN Testing with NI PXI Solutions

WLAN Testing with NI PXI Solutions

This article details National Instruments' WLAN test solutions using PXI hardware and software, covering IEEE 802.11 standards and key features.

wlan
wireless lan
ni

Z-Wave Testing: A Guide to Compliance

An overview of Z-Wave technology and the testing tools required to ensure device compliance and interoperability within the IoT ecosystem.

z-wave
iot
compliance testing